29th Annual Meeting of the American Society of Photobiology

Downtown Marriot

Chicago, Il.

July 7th-12th, 2001


UVA Protection of Sunscreen

Lim, Henry1
Department of Dermatology, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, Michigan, USA1

Abstract-
The US Food and Drug Administration released its final sunscreen monograph in May, 1999, to be fully implemented by December 31, 2002. The monograph listed 16 UV filters as approved agents; newly approved agents were avobenzone (Parsol 1789) and zinc oxide. It also specified the testing methods for determination of sun protection factor (SPF) and water resistance. Maximum SPF was to be 30+. The use of several terminologies (e.g., "sunblock,"
"anti-aging," "non-chemical," and "chemical-free") were addressed. However, sunscreen UVA protection was addressed with far less specificity. A consensus conference on this issue was held in 2000, sponsored by the American Academy of Dermatology; invited attendees included representatives from the FDA, EPA, industry, ASP, and other photobiology organizations. The following UVA protection issues were discussed: 1. In vivo methods: immediate pigment darkening (IPD), persistent pigment darkening (PPD), and UVA erythema protection factor (PFA); 2. In vitro method: critical wavelength; and 3. Labeling of sunscreens. In addition, photobiologists from the Great Britain, Australia, Germany, and Austria presented methods used in their respective country. The followings are the recommendations of the conference: 1. SPF is the primary consideration for sunscreen potency; 2. Broad spectrum sunscreens need to pass an in vitro test (critical wavelength of 370 nm or greater) and an in vivo test (PPD or PFA, with at least a 4-fold increase in protection); 3. Once the above criteria have been achieved, sunscreen would be labeled simply as "broad spectrum", therefore minimizing confusion to the consumers.

Keywords: sunscreen, UVA, pigment darkening, critical wavelength